Michael Cohen: Jerusalem UFO baffles even skeptics as new details emerge
by Dirk Vander Ploeg
Michael Cohen (firstname.lastname@example.org) of All News Web is the reporter that originally broke the story of the UFO over Jerusalem and the Dome of the Rock/Temple Mount. Now he follows up this revelation with this report:
Jerusalem UFO baffles even skeptics as new details emerge
By Michael Cohen
It has now been over two weeks since I broke the story and spoke key witnesses regarding the Jerusalem UFO that hovered over the Dome of The Rock/Temple Mount before shooting up and away.
Since then, die hard skeptics have made genuine attempts to "debunk" the sighting; to no avail.
None of the "debunkers" have been able to recreate the stunning fourth video despite having two weeks to do so. As I explain in the interview below: even assuming the fourth video was a hoax, the "hoaxers"-who hardly come across as life long UFO enthusiasts-had a day or so to create it!
Skeptics have been forced to rely on flimsy arguments in their attempts to discredit the event. They point to "mirrored" images at the edge of the first video: yet ignore the hundreds of forums by owners of digital video recorders that discuss the problem of mirrored images cropping up on their clips. That's right, many digital cameras are manufactured with software that includes the mirroring effect to counteract motion blur. Skeptical? Google the topic.
The debunkers talk of the fourth video showing evidence of both interlaced and progressive scanning (hinting at the video being CGI), they base this on the blurred image of the UFO shooting upwards: as if they could know what a UFO on a skyward trajectory should look like.
Meanwhile none of the witnesses are talking at all, to anyone. This seems more indicative of a cover-up than a hoax. The fourth video was filmed by a group of Israeli teens Yuli Cohen, Michael Naumkoff and Dor Tibi. Even the vaguest mention of the UFO event is eerily absent from all their facebook pages. Why? Do teen hoaxers really behave this way?